[Dock-fans] Fwd: simplex_random_seed
Trent E. Balius
tbalius at aol.com
Thu Nov 12 08:16:27 PST 2015
Q1: Is there any specificrange number for simplex_random_seed?
Q2: Is the zero value reliable or should it be different?
Yes, using zero is the default value.
Changing this number will give you different results.
The random seed is used during the minimization at every dock step.
As is implied in the name the random seed will perturbed your docking
results with some randomness.
Indeed, This may result in a different final pose (fairly, close in Grid Score),
which is used in the amberscore rescoring step (the differences increase at this step).
I suspect that difference in the final pose is why you are getting such variability in your results.
Look at the difference in the poses through visual inspection, RMSD calculation, Grid eneregies,
and AmberScore energies.
This might help you understand the differences and help you pick which pose you like best.
Q3: Is there any specific reference describing simplex_random_seed?
See the following:
I hope that this helps,
Trent E. Balius, PhD
Postdoc, Shoichet Lab,
Dept. Pharm. Chem., UCSF
Phone: (415) 514-4253
From: f.mohamadi <f.mohamadi at sci.ui.ac.ir>
To: dock-fans <dock-fans at docking.org>
Sent: Tue, Nov 10, 2015 12:33 am
Subject: [Dock-fans] Fwd: simplex_random_seed
I have run several docking tests with different random
seeds (0, 1000,
1500, 2000, 3000, 5000, 10000), I got very different
-29 to -70) which seems a bit strange. Is there any specific
number for simplex_random_seed? Is the zero value reliable or should
Is there any specific refference describing
I would be gratefull if somebody could help me about this
I also attached my results.
----- End forwarded
of Isfahan (http://www.ui.ac.ir)
[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type:
Dock-fans at docking.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dock-fans